Functionalism and Poverty

Bethune cookman university Poverty From A Functionalist & A Conflict stance kind Problems SO 132 John Arthur Jackson, III 9/29/2012 This assignment will psychoanalyze two different forms of neighborly depth psychology and how it relates to explaining the domain of meagreness. Functionalists Perspective & Its flock Concerning Poverty As it concerns social analysis, the functionalists deal that society is a stable, and orderly governance comprised of inter connect, and interdependent parts all(prenominal) working(a) together to achieve homeostasis (equilibrium).As far as the individual is concerned, they view them as cosmos shaped by society, a relatively passive masses molded by their experience and interactions with society. Any change that occurs in society is deemed disruptive and the establishment would judge to restore balance quickly. In addition, whatsoever part that is dysfunctional is correlated to the system as a whole, and thither is not one thing that s tands in closing off from the opposite. Concerning mendicancy, functionalists argue that beggary is not as app bent as the figures put it. at that shoes is a consensus that even though poverty is a social occupation, it isnt as abundant as we think it is.This consensus is lead it to after the functionalists take into consideration the antipoverty benefits that are available for those who experience and save give care that poverty is much lower than normal belief. So in lament footing functionalists claim that if we take into account all of the available benefits that are for unequal pot then we would come to a deduction that poverty is lower than estimation. As you end see, poverty from this perspective is still a way of life, and perhaps probably an incentive, promote everyone to work that much harder to promote general sur display case- cosmos and possible social mobility.Possibly, on that point is an ultimate balance by the initiation of poverty by depicting a clear division of power and wealth. in that location will always be the rich, and there will always be the poor and thus balance. Poverty, serves to remind those who arent in that position to have a apprehension to attain or to achieve just to avoid having to conform to the line of poverty. Also, the existence of poverty allows others to compare themselves to, just to make the contrast between the two forget certain thankfulness to their situation. As to ordain that, whatever they are going through couldnt get that much worse than someone who is already in poverty.Conflict Perspective & Its View Concerning Poverty The desire that society is just a sustained power struggle between social kindes over the availability and allocation of stingy resources would be the perspective of the Conflict Theorists. The premiss of their argument is that there doesnt remove to be a reason to place blame on race who determine themselves in an impoverished socioeconomic condition. Lo gically, if we hold back to place blame on the people who are living in poverty, we slide by to shift the focus off of the problem and onto the individual which shouldnt be the case.There should be a firm emphasis on the bigger societal problems that occur by the hands of the unstable capitalists and avaricious elitists who continue to bear on a falsified ideology for people to believe in. Conflict Theorists claim that poverty is rooted in past and dedicate prejudice and discrimi res publica that keeps people of semblance out of the economic mainstream (Kendall 2012). The subpar socioeconomically related living conditions that impoverished African Americans and other minorities find themselves in are just the fuel to the fire. Inadequate housing, sub-standard schools, and crime-ridden neighborhoods (Kendall 2012) causes the high poverty rate among the aforementioned racial groups. The lacks of regulate social policies that concern the ever-present and on-going problems of e conomic inequality continue to perpetuate the capitalistic ideology as well as subordinate the ethnic groups that face this alienation. The conflict theorists agree that the structural problems (substandard schools, incompetent housing etc. are beyond the poor persons control.So in order to rectify this situation, it would behoove the nations political and business leading to formulate a way to pay up people who are living in poverty in accordance to being able to afford the basic necessities of life. In addition, the wealthy mustiness face a tax cut, so that the middle carve up can strengthen and the lower class can shrink. In other words, in order to significantly reduce the problem of poverty conflict theorists believe that we must stop blaming the victim for being poor, except instead find a way that benefits and help the poor people arrest more affluent, not financially save but economically as well.